Enforcing Best Practices
Interview best practices, built into the workflow
Most teams adopt the visible half of interview structure, consistent questions and notes, while standardized scoring lags far behind. Ratio builds the scoring into the workflow, so the best practice is what the screen does, not a policy people remember.
Question consistency
Same questions, same order, every candidate
Every candidate for a role gets the questions in the kit, tied to the skills the job needs. Interviewers cannot drift into a different conversation with the candidate they liked on sight, because the next question is already on the screen.
- One question per skill, drafted from the job description and the hiring manager's notes
- Hard skills, domain knowledge and core competencies each get the question type that suits them
- Edits happen before the round starts, not candidate by candidate
Evaluation standardization
Written criteria under every question
The component teams skip most often is anchored scoring. Ratio puts four RATE prompts and a four-star control directly under each question, so an interviewer rates against the same written standard as everyone else, while the answer is fresh.
- Relevance, Approach, Trade-offs, Evidence: the same four prompts in every round
- Four points with no midpoint, a deliberate guard against sitting on the fence
- Notes and quoted evidence captured with the rating
Visibility and transparency
Score first, discuss second, keep every score
Interviewers score before they talk. In a panel, scores stay hidden until everyone has submitted. Every interviewer's rating stays visible on the candidate afterwards, with the evidence behind it, so the team can see where it agreed, where it did not, and why the final call went the way it did.
- Independent scoring first; discussion second
- Every interviewer's ratings preserved, never averaged away
- Per-category scores with the interview evidence behind them
Where the research points, and where Ratio puts it
Job-based questions
Questions come from a skills model built for this role, not a generic bank.
Anchored rating scales
Four RATE prompts and four stars under every question.
Detailed notes
A notes field and quoted evidence on every rating.
No discussion before scoring
Panels score alone and reveal together.
Source for the adoption gap: Roulin, Bourdage and Wingate (2019), 131 professional interviewers. Structure components from Campion, Palmer and Campion (1997). The research.
See the scoring half of structure, live
Bring a role your team is interviewing for now. We build the kit in a 30-minute working session and show where the criteria sit on the screen.