Quality of Hire

Quality hires start with the interview

Structured interviews are the #1 way to predict job performance - more than twice as predictive as unstructured conversations.

Sackett, Zhang, Berry and Lievens (2022), Journal of Applied Psychology: structured interviews r = .42, unstructured r = .19. The figures describe the method, not Ratio. Read the research page.

Skills, not proxies

Interview for the skills the job needs

Degrees and years in a title are weak proxies for the work. Ratio reads the job description and the hiring manager's notes and picks the skills that predict success in this role at this level, tagged must-have or preferred and ranked by priority.

  • Hard skills, domain knowledge and core competencies, each identified and weighted
  • A weak must-have caps the overall score, so a strong talker cannot make up for a missing skill
  • Proficiency expectations calibrated to seniority
Month-End Close: Ratio suggested Advanced, one of three levels: Beginner, Intermediate and Advanced. The hiring manager can change it, and the level sets what the questions testSet proficiency by skillRatio suggests a level for each skill. Change it if the job needs more or less.SkillMonth-End CloseDomain KnowledgeMust-haveBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedAdvancedRatio's advanced questions test critical thinking andwhether the candidate takes ownership of the outcome.
Scored answers

Every answer scored the same way

Prediction comes from consistent scoring as much as consistent questions. Under every question, four RATE prompts ask whether the candidate gave specifics, explained their approach, weighed the trade-off and showed the outcome. The Trade-offs prompt is where polished, rehearsed answers come apart.

  • Relevance, Approach, Trade-offs, Evidence under every question, every round
  • Four-star rating with no midpoint, anchored to the level of the role
  • Prepared follow-ups for when an answer runs thin
A hiring-manager question with its four anchors: Relevance names what an empty answer sounds like, and Trade-offs is the one still uncheckedScreening interview · Priya RamanQuestion 4 of 818:24End interviewMust-haveCore CompetencyIntermediateBehavioralDescribe a time when the operations team delayed sendingmonth-end inventory data, threatening your close deadline.What did you give up to get them aligned?Did the candidate:Show follow upsProvide a real example, not just mention automated email remindersExplain what they didDiscuss the tradeoffShare the outcomeYour evaluationClear3 of 4 · MeetsNext questionNotesUp next5Cost Accounting6MS Dynamics NAV7MS Excel8Problem-Solving
Comparable candidates

A decision you can explain

Human ratings roll up by skill across every round. Finalists are compared on the same criteria, with the human ratings and notes behind each score, so the offer is based on real capabilities, not gut feel.

  • Overall and per-round scores across every interviewer
  • Supporting notes, captured during or after each round
  • Confidence bars that show how far a score could still move while rounds remain
The Senior Accountant job with Julian Zimmerman opened: an overall score of 87% based on 8 of 8 skills assessed, above his four completed rounds, each with its interviewer and dateNMSenior AccountantNorthgate Manufacturing · Updated 5 mins agoMBMarcus BellScheduling:UpcomingAssessing 8 skillsIn progressJZJulian ZimmermanScheduling:CompletedBased on 8 of 8 skills assessedi87%ScreeningElena MarshInterview:CompletedApr 10, 2:30 PM · 30 minsViewHiring ManagerDevon OkaforInterview:CompletedApr 13, 2:30 PM · 45 minsViewPanel InterviewDevon Okafor + 2 othersInterview:CompletedApr 16, 11:30 AM · 45 minsViewSME InterviewSam WhitakerInterview:CompletedApr 19, 11:30 AM · 60 minsView

What the research supports

The research is about structured interviews, not about any one product. Here is what it supports, and where Ratio fits.

  • Ranked first

    In the largest recent review of hiring research, structured interviews were the best single predictor of job performance.

  • Twice as predictive

    They predict performance more than twice as well as unstructured interviews. Results vary from team to team.

  • Smaller gaps between groups

    Of the methods that predict best, structured interviews show some of the smallest score gaps between groups.

  • People decide

    Ratio adds up the ratings your interviewers give. It does not score candidates, and it cannot promise a great hire.

Questions teams ask

More questions? Read the full FAQ

Run a more predictive interview on your next role

Bring the job description. We build the structured interview kit live in a 30-minute working session, and you keep it.